1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 817 F.2d
  5. 817 F.2d 1435 (1987)
 

IN RE CEMENT AND CONCRETE ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Nos. 84-2865, 85-1670 and 85-1722 to 85-1724.

817 F.2d 1435 (1987)

In re CEMENT AND CONCRETE ANTITRUST LITIGATION. STATE OF ARIZONA, Plaintiff-Appellant. v. CITY OF AUSTIN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants, v. ARC CORPORATION, et al., Class Members-Appellees. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. STATE OF MINNESOTA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ARIZONA SLUMP BLOCK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION, City of Austin, et al., Defendants-Appellees. SMITH & GREEN CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION, City of Austin, et al., Defendants-Appellees. STATE OF ALABAMA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 4, 1987.

Decided May 27, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Greene, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., Patricia A. Cutler, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., Thomas F. Catania, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Minn., James Prude, Asst. Atty. Gen., Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellants States of California, Minnesota, and Alabama.

Kenneth R. Reed and Dee Ann Mowry Rogers, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellant State of Arizona.

Carl W. Divelbiss, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiffs-appellants Arizona Slump Block, Inc. and Smith & Green Corp.

David J. Leonard and David H. Nix, Tucson, Ariz., for class members-appellees Allied Concrete, Inc., et al.

Kurt W. Melchior, San Francisco, Cal., for class members-appellees Arc Corp. and its subsidiaries.

Ralph E. Hunsaker, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellant Arizona Slump Block, Inc.

Before WALLACE, HUG and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

In this consolidated action, the parties appeal from the district court's judgment and orders certified for appeal which encompass a plan for distributing a fund created by the settlement of a multidistrict class action alleging a nationwide conspiracy to fix the price of cement. The appellants contend that the "offset" provision in the plan is inequitable, that certain parties should have been excluded from participation, and that other potential...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases