HAMBY v. JANER

Nos. 86-7222, 86-7227 Non-Argument Calendar.

808 F.2d 1433 (1987)

Gene M. HAMBY, Jr. and Robert M. Baker, a partnership doing business as Hamby & Baker, Attorneys, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Edward J. JANER, an indispensable party; United States Department of Labor, United States of America, William Brock, as Secretary of Labor, Defendants-Appellees. Gene M. HAMBY, Jr. and Robert M. Baker, a partnership d/b/a Hamby & Baker, Attorneys, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ruben L. HOLCOMBE, an indispensable party, Plaintiff, United States Department of Labor, United States of America; William Brock, as Secretary of Labor, United States of America, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

February 2, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gene M. Hamby, Jr., Hamby & Baker, Sheffield, Ala., pro se.

Frank W. Donaldson, U.S. Atty., George C. Batcheler, Birmingham, Ala., for defendants-appellees.

Before TJOFLAT, HATCHETT and CLARK, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the district court dismissing their actions for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.1 The district court found, 630 F.Supp. 199, and we agree, that the federal statute at issue expressly precludes judicial review of the administrative decisions challenged in these lawsuits. Therefore, we affirm the decision of the district court.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases