U.S. v. DEDERICH

Nos. 86-1387, 86-1388, 87-7052 and 87-7055.

825 F.2d 1317 (1987)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cecilia Jason DEDERICH; Elizabeth A. Missakian, Defendants-Appellants. The UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David R. BENJAMIN; Philip C. Bourdette; Miriam R. Bourdette; Cecilia J. Dederich; Dan L. Garrett, Jr.; Elizabeth Missakian; Steven Simon; Dan Sorkin, Defendants-Appellants. David R. BENJAMIN, Miriam R. Bourdette, Philip C. Bourdette, Cecilia Jason Dederich, Dan L. Garrett, Jr., Elizabeth A. Missakian, Steven Simon and Dan Sorkin, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, United States of America, Real Party in Interest. Cecilia Jason DEDERICH and Elizabeth Missakian, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, United States of America, Real Party in Interest.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

August 19, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Guy L. Goodwin, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.

Robert D. Luskin, Washington, D.C., Kenneth W. De Vaney, Fresno, Cal., Thomas J. Nolan, Palo Alto, Cal., Richard Mazer, San Francisco, Cal., Jay W. Powell, Visalia, Cal., Tom Henze, Phoenix, Ariz., Robert N. Harris, Los Angeles, Cal., John L. Williams, San Jose, Cal., and Salvatore Sciandra, Fresno, Cal., for defendants-appellants.

Before CANBY, REINHARDT and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.


CANBY, Circuit Judge:

ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS

CONDITIONAL PETITIONS FOR MANDAMUS

Eight defendants appeal the district court's denial of their motions to dismiss an indictment on grounds of prosecutorial misconduct before the grand jury. Two of the defendants, Dederich and Missakian, also separately appeal the district court's denial of their motion to dismiss the indictment for violation of transactional immunity granted by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases