PRINTING MART-MORRISTOWN, INC. v. ROSENTHAL

Civ. A. No. 86-3224.

650 F.Supp. 1444 (1987)

PRINTING MART-MORRISTOWN, INC., a New Jersey corporation, Plaintiff, v. Bert ROSENTHAL, Larry Sinoway, Allan Essenfeld, Laurriet Printing Co., Inc. and Sharp Electronics Corp., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

January 5, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

D. Gayle Loftis, Jersey City, N.J., for Printing Mart-Morristown, Inc.

Michael Meisel, Cole, Schotz, Bernstein, Meisel & Forman, Hackensack, N.J., for Rosenthal and Laurriet Printing Co., Inc.

Arthur Schmauder, Shanley & Fisher, Morristown, N.J., for Simoway and Sharp Electronics Corp.


OPINION

SAROKIN, District Judge.

Defendants move before the court to dismiss plaintiff's complaint in this Racketeer Influenced and Organized Crime Act (RICO) action. See 18 U.S.C. Section 1962 et. seq. Defendants argue that failure to raise the RICO claim in an earlier state court action precludes plaintiff from subsequent litigation of this claim under New Jersey's "entire controversy doctrine".

The court grants this motion with great...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases