RAY v. TATE

Civ. A. No. C-2-84-1559.

651 F.Supp. 1412 (1987)

Antonio M. RAY, Petitioner, v. Arthur TATE, Jr., Supt., Respondent.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, E.D.

February 2, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip H. Sheridan, Jr., Jones & Sheridan, Columbus, Ohio, for petitioner.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., Atty. Gen. and James A. Carr and Behtene A. Lindstedt, Asst. Attys. Gen., Columbus, Ohio, for respondent.


OPINION AND ORDER

GRAHAM, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the Respondent's objection to the February 12, 1986 report and recommendation of the Magistrate.

The Petitioner alleges that he is in custody in violation of the United States Constitution on the following grounds:

1. The refusal of the prosecution to honor petitioner's request for disclosure of the informant's identity prejudiced his defense. 2. The prosecution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases