U.S. v. SHARON

No. 85-5293.

812 F.2d 1233 (1987)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph SHARON, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided March 18, 1987.

As Amended April 6, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Victor Sherman, Janet Sherman, Santa Monica, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Laurie L. Levenson, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before WRIGHT, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and MUECKE, Senior District Judge.


EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

Sharon argues that the district court judge's failure to advise him of a special parole term violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. He also argues that the court violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32 by not making and attaching findings as to the accuracy of the presentencing materials. We reverse because Rule 11 was violated.

BACKGROUND

The judge asked Sharon if he had been advised of the maximum...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases