MULLENDORE v. CAREY

85-399-CV; CA A39304.

735 P.2d 1300 (1987)

85 Or.App. 211

Pauline V. MULLENDORE, Respondent — Cross-Appellant, v. Cheryl A. CAREY, Bill K. Bragg and Phillip Moerchell, Aka Phillip Moershell, Dba the Nickel, Appellants — Cross-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 22, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. Ferguson, Medford, argued the cause for appellants — cross-respondents. With him on the briefs was Grant, Ferguson, Carter, Medford.

Bonham J. Matzen, Klamath Falls, argued the cause for respondent — cross-appellant. On the brief was Neal G. Buchanan, Klamath Falls.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff sought specific performance of an earnest money agreement. The trial court held that there was no valid contract between the parties and awarded defendants costs but no attorney fees. Defendants appeal the denial of attorney fees, and plaintiff cross-appeals the denial of specific performance as to defendant Carey. We reverse on appeal and affirm on cross-appeal.

The contract which plaintiff sought to enforce contains the following provision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases