BOWEN-McLAUGHLIN-YORK CO. v. U.S.

Appeal No. 86-1577.

813 F.2d 1221 (1987)

BOWEN-McLAUGHLIN-YORK COMPANY, A DIVISION OF HARSCO CORP., Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 16, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas A. Schmutz, Newman & Holtzinger, P.C., Washington, D.C., argued, for appellant. With him on the brief, was Karol Lyn Newman.

Sharon Y. Eubanks, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued, for appellee. With her on the brief, were Richard K. Willard, Asst. Atty. Gen. and David M. Cohen, Director. Major Harry Lee Dorsey, Dept. of the Army, Pentagon, Washington, D.C., of counsel.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges.


DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

The Claims Court refused to reform appellant's Government contract, a reformation sought because of a mutual mistake in costs, on the ground that the Government had not undertaken to bear the risk of the mutual mistake the parties made. We reverse.

I.

Appellant, Bowen-McLaughlin-York Company (BMY) entered (on March 31, 1977) into a letter contract with the United States Army Tank-Automotive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases