MILL CREEK SPORTSMEN v. LAND CONSERVATION

85-ACK-176; CA A38619.

735 P.2d 1294 (1987)

85 Or.App. 205

MILL CREEK SPORTSMEN's Association, Inc., Eastern Oregon Fly Fishing and Fiction Association, and Oregon Trout, Petitioners, v. LAND CONSERVATION and Development Commission, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 22, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Liberty, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

David G. Ellis, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Petitioners are associations of fishers, hunters and others interested in the preservation of wildlife and game fish habitat. They seek review of an order of the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) which acknowledged Umatilla County's Comprehensive Plan as being in compliance with Goal 5. The county and LCDC relied on an interpretation of the relationship between Goal 5 and the Forest Practices...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases