1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 810 F.2d
  5. 810 F.2d 1215 (1987)
 

U.S. v. HOLLAND

No. 86-3027.

810 F.2d 1215 (1987)

UNITED STATES of America v. Rufus HOLLAND, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided February 6, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy Beer (student counsel), with whom Nancy Louis Cook, Washington, D.C., (appointed by this Court) was on brief, for appellant.

Mary Incontro, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Joseph E. diGenova, U.S. Atty., Michael W. Farrell, Thomas J. Tourish, Jr., and Robert E. McDaniel, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for appellee.

Before MIKVA and BUCKLEY, Circuit Judges, and PARSONS, Senior District Judge.

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior District Judge PARSONS.

PARSONS, Senior District Judge:

Rufus Holland was indicted and convicted under 21 U.S.C. sec. 845a of six counts of selling a controlled substance within 1,000 feet of a school. On appeal he challenges the constitutionality of that statute. We hold that the statute as applied to Holland is constitutional and affirm his conviction and sentence.

The facts that led to Holland's conviction are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases