1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 740 P.2d
  5. 740 P.2d 1224 (1987)
 

STATE v. DIXSON

84-1823, 84-1821, 84-1822; CA A34586 (control), CA A34808, CA A34817.

740 P.2d 1224 (1987)

87 Or.App. 1

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. THERESA DIXSON, Appellant. State of Oregon, Respondent, v. JEFFREY D. DIGBY, Appellant. State of Oregon, Respondent, v. LORIN LOU DIXSON, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided August 12, 1987.

Resubmitted March 12, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James C. Coffey, North Bend, argued the cause for appellant Jeffrey D. Digby. With him on the brief were Hayner, Waring, Stebbins & Coffey, North Bend; Nicholas C. Nylander and Flaxel, Todd & Nylander, North Bend; and Kathleen P. Eymann and Chandler & Stokes, Coos Bay.

Nicholas C. Nylander, North Bend, argued the cause for appellant Lorin Lou Dixson. With him on the brief were Flaxel, Todd & Nylander, North Bend; James C. Coffey and Hayner, Waring, Stebbins & Coffey, North Bend; and Kathleen P. Eymann and Chandler & Stokes, Coos Bay.

Kathleen P. Eymann and Chandler & Stokes, Coos Bay, filed the brief for appellant Theresa Dixson. With them on the brief were James C. Coffey and Hayner, Waring, Stebbins & Coffey, North Bend; Nicholas C. Nylander and Flaxel, Todd & Nylander, North Bend.

Stephen F. Peifer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Resubmitted In Banc March 12, 1987.

YOUNG, Judge.

In these consolidated cases, defendants appeal from their convictions for the manufacture and possession of a controlled substance. They contend that the trial court erred in denying their motions to suppress evidence seized from the Dixsons' property in a warrantless search. The issue is whether Article I, section 9,1 of the Oregon Constitution requires a warrant for a search of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases