Per Curiam.
Upon careful review of the entire record and the stipulations entered into by the parties, it is clear that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(6), 3-101(B), 6-101(A)(3) and 7-101(A)(2), and Gov. Bar R. VI. It is also clear from the record that the panel which heard respondent's testimony fully considered his unsubstantiated testimony and gave him the chance to present supporting medical evidence which could have been considered in mitigation. For whatever...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
