1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 834 F.2d
  5. 834 F.2d 1128 (1987)
 

IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM DATED MAY 29, 1987

No. 354, Docket 87-6193.

834 F.2d 1128 (1987)

In re GRAND JURY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM DATED MAY 29, 1987. John DOE and Jane Doe, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided October 2, 1987.

Opinion December 1, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen E. Kaufman, New York City (Dominic F. Amorosa, Roanne L. Mann, New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

James R. DeVita, Asst. U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City (Rudolph W. Giuliani, U.S. Atty. S.D.N.Y., Aaron R. Marcu, Asst. U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before VAN GRAAFEILAND, MESKILL and NEWMAN, Circuit Judges.

MESKILL, Circuit Judge:

John and Jane Doe appeal from a decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Broderick, J., allowing them to intervene but denying their motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum directed to their administrative assistant Richard Roe. Doe and Roe are pseudonyms used to preserve the anonymity of the principals involved and the secrecy of the underlying grand jury proceedings. The district court simultaneously...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases