1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 742 P.2d
  5. 742 P.2d 1176 (1987)
 

DUYCK v. TUALATIN VALLEY IRRIGATION DIST.

TC 41-164; CA A32381; SC S33201.

742 P.2d 1176 (1987)

304 Or. 151

Lloyd DUYCK and Geraldine Duyck, Petitioners On Review, v. TUALATIN VALLEY IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Respondent On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided September 22, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. Moore, Hillsboro, argued the cause for petitioners on review. With him on the brief was Brink, Moore, Brink & Peterson, Hillsboro.

Alfred T. McGill, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review.

Before PETERSON, C.J., and LENT, LINDE, CAMPBELL, CARSON and JONES, JJ.

PETERSON, Chief Justice.

The plaintiffs brought this action against defendant Tualatin Valley Irrigation District (TVID) alleging that TVID negligently misrepresented the availability of irrigation water and that TVID negligently failed to warn the plaintiffs that water would not be available for the 1978 growing season. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. On the defendant's appeal, the Court of Appeals held that the plaintiffs' action was barred...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases