BRIGHAM TRUCK & IMPLEMENT CO. v. FRIDAL

No. 20004.

746 P.2d 1171 (1987)

BRIGHAM TRUCK AND IMPLEMENT COMPANY, a Utah corporation, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Ronald K. FRIDAL, aka Ron K. Fridal, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of Utah.

November 27, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack H. Molgard and Quinn D. Hunsaker, Brigham City, for defendant and appellant.

Roger F. Baron, Brigham City, for plaintiff and respondent.


PER CURIAM:

Defendant appeals from an adverse summary judgment awarding plaintiff $19,089.58 as a deficiency judgment after repossession and sale of an International tractor purchased by defendant. We affirm.

In reviewing a summary judgment, we consider the record in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, resolving all doubt in his favor. Reagan Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Lundgren, 692 P.2d 776

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases