IN RE U.S.

No. 86-3474.

816 F.2d 1083 (1987)

In re UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided April 8, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. Henry Habicht, II, Asst. Atty. Gen. Jacques B. Gelin, Patricia Gail Littlefield, David C. Shilton, Albert M. Ferlo, Jr., Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Peter R. Steenland, Jr. (argued), Steven D. Bell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Cleveland, Ohio, Jonathan McPhee, U.S. E.P.A., Region V, Chicago, Ill., Helen Keplinger, Office of Enforcement & Compliance, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

William P. Bobulsky, Ashtabula, Ohio, for Laskin & Poplar.

Robert M. McNair, Robert M. McNair Co., LPA, Jefferson, Ohio, Michael L. Hardy, Thompson, Hine and Flory, Cleveland, Ohio, for Warren.

Thomas P. Meaney, Jr., Cleveland, Ohio, for Schlumberger.

Cornelius C. Smith, Jr., Danbury, Conn., Karen B. Newborn, Baker & Hostetler, Cleveland, Ohio, for Union Carbide.

Louis Tosi, Fuller & Henry, Toledo, Ohio, for General Motors.

Clay Mock, Arter & Hadden, Cleveland, Ohio, for Be-Kan.

Thomas Sivak, Environmental Counsel, Pittsburgh, Pa., for Koppers.

William Smith, Calfee, Halter & Griswold, Cleveland, Ohio, for Union Carbide.

Jeffrey G. Miller, Thomas Hays, Verner, Liipfert, Bernhard, McPherson and Hand, Washington, D.C., for other respondents.

Michael L. Hardy, Thompson, Hine and Flory, Cleveland, Ohio, for Rockwell.

W. Mowry Connelly, Michael T. McMenamin, Marcia E. Hurt, Walter, Haverfield, Buescher & Chockly, Maureen Brennan, Environmental Counsel, Cleveland, Ohio, for TRW.

Before MERRITT and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.


MILBURN, Circuit Judge.

The United States of America petitions this court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio to limit its order of reference to a special master, in the underlying action, to discovery and other procedural, nondispositive matters. The government contends that the district court abused its discretion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases