CITY OF HILLSBORO v. PURCELL

85-0424, 85-0425; CA A41670 (Control), A41671.

743 P.2d 1119 (1987)

87 Or.App. 649

CITY OF HILLSBORO, Respondent, v. David L. PURCELL, Appellant. City of Hillsboro, Respondent, v. Pete N. Dominici, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 14, 1987.

Reconsideration Denied December 11, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gordon T. Carey, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was David M. Taylor, Portland.

Todd A. Bradley, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Defendants are door-to-door salesmen. They appeal1 their convictions for violating an ordinance of the city of Hillsboro, which prohibits "calling at residences" to make sales or for certain other commercial purposes. In legal literature it has been known as a "Green River Ordinance." Defendants argue that the ordinance violates the federal and state constitutions in a number of respects. We agree with their...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases