1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 668 F.Supp.
  5. 668 F.Supp. 1179 (1987)
 

CADDOCK v. HY-MEG CORP.

No. 86 C 6013.

668 F.Supp. 1179 (1987)

Richard E. CADDOCK and Caddock Electronics, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. HY-MEG CORPORATION, Gregory Rebchook and Vincent Cupidro, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

August 31, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur A. Olson, Jr./J. Bradford Leaheey, Neuman, Williams, Anderson & Olson, Chicago, Ill., Richard F. Carr/Richard L. Gausewitz, Gausewitz, Carr & Rothenberg, Orange, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Thomas R. Vigil, Vigil, Meroni & White, Barrington, Ill., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Plaintiffs Richard E. Caddock and Caddock Electronics, Inc. bring this patent infringement action against defendants Hy-Meg Corporation, Gregory Rebchook and Vincent Cupidro. Plaintiffs allege that a resistor made and sold by the Hy-Meg Corporation ("Hy-Meg resistor") infringes on plaintiffs' patent of a non-inductive filmtype cylindrical resistor ("Caddock resistor"). Defendants move for summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases