1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 669 F.Supp.
  5. 669 F.Supp. 1123 (1987)
 

MAYFIELD v. MEESE

Civ. A. No. 86-435.

669 F.Supp. 1123 (1987)

Willie N. MAYFIELD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Edwin MEESE, United States Attorney General, Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

March 19, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Langley R. Shook and Darren Sharpe, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs.

Richard E. Greenberg and Andrea Newmark, Civil Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN H. PRATT, District Judge.

The court has before it, inter alia, defendant's motion to dismiss, or in the alternative to strike the class allegations. Because the questions raised by the motion to dismiss are logically addressed prior to a determination of the class issues, we address only those parts of defendant's motion attacking the claims of the named plaintiffs. Defendant's alternative motion to strike the class allegations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases