1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 680 F.Supp.
  5. 680 F.Supp. 1110 (1987)
 

GRIMES v. DAYTON-WALTHER CORP.

No. C-3-85-026.

680 F.Supp. 1110 (1987)

James GRIMES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DAYTON-WALTHER CORP., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D.

August 7, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James B. Robinson, David M. Cook, Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

Frank H. Stewart, Martin McHenry, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendants.

OPINION; FINDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; FURTHER PROCEDURES SET FOR PAYMENT OF BENEFITS DUE PLAINTIFFS, TO WIT: DEFENDANT GRANTED TWENTY DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF OPINION TO FILE PLAN TO GUARANTEE FUTURE BENEFITS AND PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT GRANTED TWENTY DAYS TO FILE STIPULATIONS AS TO BENEFITS PAST DUE OR TO NOTIFY COURT THAT SUCH STIPULATIONS CANNOT BE REACHED

RICE, District Judge.

This case was heard by the Court, sitting as trier of fact, on September...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases