1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 823 F.2d
  5. 823 F.2d 965 (1987)
 

U.S. v. PURTHER

No. 86-1636.

823 F.2d 965 (1987)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Franklin PURTHER, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided July 15, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neil H. Fink (argued), Detroit, Mich., Michael J. Rex, for defendant-appellant.

F. William Soisson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., Patricia G. Blake, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before LIVELY, Chief Judge; ENGEL and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges.

LIVELY, Chief Judge.

The defendant-appellant was convicted of mail fraud and sentenced to serve a prison term. In addition, the district court ordered him to make restitution to the individual victims of the mail fraud scheme in the amount of $731,209. On appeal the defendant contends that the district court erroneously ordered restitution, claiming that the offenses for which he was convicted took place prior to the effective date of the Victim and Witness Protection...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases