1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 731 P.2d
  5. 731 P.2d 1057 (1987)
 

LEIBRECHT v. HAWKINS

84-7-60; CA A37717.

731 P.2d 1057 (1987)

83 Or.App. 396

Bert LEIBRECHT, Appellant, v. Harold Cecil HAWKINS, Defendant, and Harold Cecil Hawkins, Jr., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 28, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert N. Snee, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

A. Gregory McKenzie, Oregon City, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Canning, Tait & McKenzie, P.C., Oregon City.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

WARREN, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a directed verdict, contending that sufficient evidence was introduced at trial to create a jury question regarding defendant's alleged conversion of plaintiff's parachute. We agree and reverse.

A trial court should direct a verdict only when reasonable people can draw but one conclusion from the evidence presented. James v. Carnation Co., 278 Or. 65, 69, 562 P.2d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases