DOE v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF CHICAGO

No. 85 C 3742.

668 F.Supp. 1110 (1987)

Jane DOE, Plaintiff, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

June 30, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Mattenson, Stuart Gordon, William J. Arendt, Kanter and Mattenson, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Peter J. Kilchenmann, Lynn A. Goldstein, Linda S. Ruel, Kathleen Conlon, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

PARSONS, Senior District Judge:

INTRODUCTION

Jane Doe brought suit under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. against her former employer, the First National Bank of Chicago. She alleged that one of her supervisors, Mary Roe, was the prime mover in bringing about her discharge, and that she, Jane, was discharged because she procured an abortion and Mary was horrified about her...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases