Denied.
CALOGERO, J., expresses the additional observation the Court was advised after its action denying this writ that the district court has not yet acted on the identical application and that the Court should have been, but was not so advised by applicant's attorney. I am of the view that the district court should still act on the application pending there, and that thereafter applicant is at liberty to file anew in this Court such pleading or renewal of application...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
