MURRAY v. JOHNSON

16303; CA A40332.

738 P.2d 1005 (1987)

86 Or.App. 295

Richard J. MURRAY, Respondent — Cross-Appellant, v. Karl A. JOHNSON, Appellant — Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 8, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Cushman, Hood River, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant — cross-respondent.

Arthur Knauss, Milwaukie, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent — cross-appellant.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


WARDEN, Presiding Judge.

In this action for dissolution of a partnership and an accounting, defendant appeals from a judgment entered on the basis of evidence from an appraisal stipulated to by the parties, and plaintiff cross-appeals. We modify in part on the appeal and affirm on the cross-appeal.

Plaintiff and defendant entered into a joint venture to purchase, subdivide and sell a tract of real property. Defendant was the managing partner. Plaintiff sued...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases