1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 833 F.2d
  5. 833 F.2d 908 (1987)
 

JOHNSON v. HENDRICKS

Nos. 85-2708 to 85-2720.

833 F.2d 908 (1987)

James P. JOHNSON, as Equity Receiver to Collect Assets, on behalf of the Claimants of Chilcott Commodities Corporation, Chilcott Portfolio Management, Inc., Thomas D. Chilcott, d/b/a Chilcott Futures Fund, Thomas D. Chilcott, and Chilcott Futures Fund, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Don R. HENDRICKS and Betty M. Hendricks; Gary K. Hilgers and Dona M. Hilgers; Richard R. and Delores Grenfell; Vesta E. Dilts; Chester D. Huffmire and Shirley J. Huffmire; John T. and Annis L. Doto; Charles V. Roth, Jr.; Malvin M. Krinsky and Florence Krinsky; Lawrence W. Sadil and Virginia R. Sadil; Elizabeth A. Demaree, M.E. Demaree and D.C. Demaree; Rosemarie E. Sprague; Joseph Studholme and Renebelle B. Studholme; and Charles H. Pope, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

December 3, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald L. Bader, Jr. (Pamela N. Hultin, and Ann L. Duckett with him on the brief), Bader & Cox, Denver, Colo., for plaintiff-appellant.

Stuart N. Bennett (Mark J. Appelton, Roath & Brega, P.C., Denver, Colo., Shannon A. Robinson and Lynda H. Knowles, Richard J. Spelts, P.C., Denver, Colo., James R. Figg, Warkentine, Figg & Gerdes, Broomfield, Colo., J. Lawrence Hamil and Richard C. Morris, Hamil Professional Corp., Denver, Colo., Craig D. Joyce, Walters & Theis, Denver, Colo., Maurice Reuler and Robert W. Becker, Mason, Reuler and Peek Professional Corp., Denver, Colo., John A. Studholme and Fred W. Clifford, Boulder, Colo., Jeffrey L. Smith and Sheldon L. Abramson, Cohen Brame & Smith, Denver, Colo., with him on the briefs), Roath & Brega, P.C., Denver, Colo., for defendants-appellees.

Before McKAY, SEYMOUR and TACHA, Circuit Judges.

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought by James P. Johnson, as equity receiver on behalf of the claimants of Chilcott Commodities Corporation and various other entities, to recover amounts paid to investors in excess of their contributions. The district court granted defendant investors' motions to dismiss. Johnson v. Studholme, 619 F.Supp. 1347 (D.Colo.1985). The receiver has appealed.

We affirm substantially...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases