1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 193 Cal.App.3d
  5. 193 Cal.App.3d 1544 (1987)
 

SAN FRAN. FOR REASONABLE v. CITY OF SAN FRAN.

Docket No. A032830.

193 Cal.App.3d 1544 (1987)

239 Cal. Rptr. 183

SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE GROWTH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Defendants and Respondents; CITICORP et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

August 10, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Sue C. Hestor and Herb Schwartz for Plaintiff and Appellant.

George Agnost and Louise H. Renne, City Attorneys, Paula Jesson and Noreen M. Ambrose, Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendants and Respondents.

Howard N. Ellman, Kenneth N. Burns Ellman, Burke & Cassidy, Jonathan R. Bass and Coblentz, Cahen, McCabe & Breyer for Real Parties in Interest and Resondents.

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

OPINION

ROUSE, J.

Plaintiff, San Franciscans for Reasonable Growth (SFRG), appeals from a judgment discharging a writ of administrative mandate. That writ required the City and County of San Francisco (City), its Planning Commission (Commission) and its Board of Permit Appeals (Board), to vacate certification...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases