1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 30 Ohio
  5. 30 Ohio St. 3d 143 (1987)
 

UNIV. OF TOLEDO v. HEINY

No. 86-1149.

30 Ohio St. 3d 143 (1987)

UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO, APPELLEE, v. HEINY; ADMINISTRATOR, OHIO BUREAU OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 20, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Spengler, Nathanson, Heyman, McCarthy & Durfee and James P. Triona, for appellee.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, Patrick A. Devine and John F. Kozlowski, for appellants.

LOCHER, J.

The issue presented in this action is whether the claimant was entitled to unemployment benefits. We hold in the negative.

The resolution of this controversy rests upon an interpretation of R.C. 4141.29(I)(1)(b). This section provides:

"Benefits based on service for an educational institution or an institution of higher education in other than an instructional, research, or principal

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases