1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 822 F.2d
  5. 822 F.2d 896 (1987)
 

MAY v. WATT

Nos. 83-6243, 83-6246.

822 F.2d 896 (1987)

Cliff MAY, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Appellant, v. Ray WATT; Ellis Ring; Charles C. Reed; Sam Kiyotoki, d/b/a Kiyotoki/Hamilton Assoc.; Watt Industries, Inc.; Century Woods Partnership; Toronto Dominion Bank of California; Century Hill Realty Co., d/b/a Century Woods Realty Company, Defendants/Appellees, and Ring Brothers Corporation, a California Corp., Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided July 22, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wilmer E. Windham, Encino, Cal., for plaintiff/counter-defendant/appellant.

Hillel Chodos (Gina M. Putkoski, on brief), Beverly Hills, Cal., for defendant/counter-plaintiff/appellee.

Before WRIGHT, REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and COPPLE, District Judge.

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

May seeks reversal of directed verdicts in favor of Ray Watt and Ring Brothers Corporation, building developers, for alleged violations of copyright law, the Lanham Act, fraud, and tortious breach of contract. He also seeks reversal of the trial court's failure to submit a proffered jury instruction on contract rescission and quantum meruit recovery. On their cross-appeal, Watt and Ring Brothers appeal the trial court's denial of their motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases