1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 109 N.J.
  5. 109 N.J. 62 (1987)
 

WOODLAND PRIVATE STUDY GROUP v. STATE

109 N.J. 62 (1987)

533 A.2d 387

WOODLAND PRIVATE STUDY GROUP, MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, AND ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, RESPONDENTS, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, AND ROBERT E. HUGHEY, COMMISSIONER, OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 16, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary C. Jacobson, Deputy Atty. Gen., argued the cause for appellants (W. Cary Edwards, Atty. Gen., James J. Ciancia, Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel).

William H. Hyatt, Jr. argued the cause for respondents (Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch, attorneys; Mr. Hyatt, Robert G. Rose, and William J. Friedman, on brief).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by CLIFFORD, Justice.

Plaintiffs, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and Rohm and Haas Company, known collectively as Woodland Private Study Group, challenge an Administrative Order, AO-69, issued by the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Protection. Annexed to the order is a "policy statement" regarding "Participation of Responsible Parties in the Development of Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases