1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 674 F.Supp.
  5. 674 F.Supp. 1034 (1987)
 

U.S. v. BIAGGI

No. 87 Cr. 265 (CBM).

674 F.Supp. 1034 (1987)

UNITED STATES of America v. Mario BIAGGI, Stanley Simon, Peter Neglia, John Mariotta, Bernard Ehrlich, Richard Biaggi, and Ronald Betso.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

November 5, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James C. McKay, Independent Counsel, Washington, D.C. by Carol E. Bruce and Daniel J. Bussel, Associate Independent Counsel, for U.S.

Dominic F. Amorosa, New York City, for defendants.

OPINION

MOTLEY, District Judge.

On July 13, 1987, defendant Richard Biaggi served a subpoena duces tecum pursuant to Fed.R.Crim P. 17(c) upon Independent Counsel James C. McKay, returnable November 9, 1987.1 That subpoena demanded production of:

1. All documents and/or information in your possession or under your control relating to the possibility that things of value were furnished to Edwin Meese, the Attorney...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases