1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 191 Cal.App.3d
  5. 191 Cal.App.3d 1514 (1987)
 

ROSSO, JOHNSON, ROSSO & EBERSOLD v. SUPERIOR CT.

Docket No. A036998.

191 Cal.App.3d 1514 (1987)

237 Cal. Rptr. 242

ROSSO, JOHNSON, ROSSO & EBERSOLD et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; PATTI FITZPATRICK-POTTER, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

May 20, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Patricia Wilson and Hadfield & Jorgensen for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

William L. Veen and Kevin Lancaster for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

POCHE, J.

Petitioners, an attorney and the law firm of which he is a member, seek a writ of mandate or prohibition to restrain respondent court from requiring disclosure of the names of persons who responded to an advertisement of petitioners. We agree that the names of these persons are protected by the attorney-client privilege.

Petitioners placed a newspaper advertisement directed toward women who might have suffered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases