RUSS BLDG. v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Docket Nos. A030997, A033493.

199 Cal.App.3d 1496 (1987)

246 Cal. Rptr. 21

RUSS BUILDING PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant and Respondent. PACIFIC GATEWAY ASSOCIATES JOINT VENTURE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant and Respondent. CROCKER NATIONAL BANK et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

January 20, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Allan N. Littman, Robert M. Westberg, Kevin M. Fong, Debra B. Keil, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, James P. Bennett, Leigh R. Shields and Morrison & Foerster for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Louise Renne, City Attorney, Burk E. Delventhal, Deputy City Attorney, George E. Krueger, Jerome B. Falk, Jr., Peter J. Busch and Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Robertson & Falk for Defendant and Respondent.


[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

OPINION

LOW, P.J.

We hold that the San Francisco Transit Impact Development Fee Ordinance is valid.

.... .... .... .... .... .*

In this consolidated appeal, plaintiff Russ Building Partnership1 (hereafter Russ Building plaintiff), and plaintiffs Pacific Gateway Associates Joint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases