1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 666 F.Supp.
  5. 666 F.Supp. 1027 (1987)
 

H.H. ROBERTSON CO. v. BARGAR METAL FABRICATING CO.

No. C80-1166.

666 F.Supp. 1027 (1987)

H.H. ROBERTSON COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BARGAR METAL FABRICATING CO., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D.

January 15, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul A. Weick, Weick & Gibson, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, Arland T. Stein, Frederick H. Colen, Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Stephen A. Hill, Pearne, Gordon, Sessions, McCoy & Granger, Cleveland, Ohio, Ernest I. Gifford, Gifford, Vanophem, Sheridan, Sprinkle, & Nabozny, Birmingham, Mich., Mark C. Pierce, Pierce & Pierce, W. Bloomfield, Mich., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DOWD, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

By virtue of the plaintiff's objections to the August 22, 1986 report and recommendation of Magistrate Charles Laurie, the Court has before it for resolution the issue of the extent to which an intervening defendant in a patent action may be subjected to discovery in the accounting phase of the litigation to determine if the intervenor is engaging in infringement conduct for which it is liable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases