1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 521 A.2d
  5. 521 A.2d 1168 (1987)
 

SANDOVAL v. MENDEZ

No. 85-1112.

521 A.2d 1168 (1987)

Julia SANDOVAL, Appellant, v. Jose E. MENDEZ, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided March 6, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert D. Dinerstein, Washington College of Law, Ann Wilcox-Staats, Student Atty., and Laura A. Foggan, Women's Legal Defense Fund, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for appellant.

No brief filed by appellee.

Before PRYOR, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and FERREN, Associate Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Sandoval contends the trial court erroneously concluded as a matter of law that she was not entitled to a civil protection order since she did not have an "intimate relationship" with Jose Mendez within the meaning of D.C.Code § 16-1001(5)(B) (1986 Supp.). We affirm.

Sandoval lived in a common household with her boyfriend (Marquez) and Mendez and his girlfriend (Claros). Marquez and Claros are cousins. Sandoval, claiming all four of the members...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases