1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 674 F.Supp.
  5. 674 F.Supp. 999 (1987)
 

CORNING GLASS WORKS v. SO. NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE

No. CIV-85-1549T.

674 F.Supp. 999 (1987)

CORNING GLASS WORKS, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. New York.

June 2, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nixon, Hargrave, Devans & Doyle (David M. Lascell, of counsel), Rochester, N.Y., Fish & Neave (Lars I. Kulleseid, W. Edward Bailey, Daniel M. Gantt, of counsel), New York City, Alfred L. Michaelsen, Corning Glass Works, Patent Dept. Corning, N.Y., for plaintiff.

Harris, Beach, Wilcox, Rubin & Levey, Rochester, N.Y., Sidley & Austin (Steven M. Bierman, of counsel), New York City, for defendant.

Harter, Secrest & Emery (Anthony R. Palermo, of counsel), Rochester, N.Y., for 3rd party defendant.

DECISION and ORDER

TELESCA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Corning Glass Works ("Corning") commenced this action seeking a declaratory judgment that defendant Southern New England Telephone Company ("SNET") is not sublicensed to use certain of Corning's patents relating to the manufacture of optical waveguide fiber ("optical fiber patents"). SNET maintains that it possesses a valid sublicense for the patents in question, asserts affirmative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases