1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 732 P.2d
  5. 732 P.2d 940 (1987)
 

STATE v. KISSELL

83-1721; CA A37867.

732 P.2d 940 (1987)

83 Or.App. 630

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Hal Lindsey KISSELL, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 11, 1987.

Reconsideration Denied March 13, 1987.

Review Allowed March 31, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest E. Estes, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Stephen F. Peifer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

ROSSMAN, Judge.

In this case, we are again presented with the issue we confronted in State v. Neidenbach, 73 Or.App. 476, 698 P.2d 1040, rev. allowed, 299 Or. 522, 702 P.2d 1112, rev. dismissed, 300 Or. 176, 708 P.2d 355 (1985): whether the exclusionary rule applies to probation revocation hearings. In Neidenbach...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases