WARMKA v. HARTLAND CICERO MUT. INS.

No. 84-1901.

136 Wis.2d 31 (1987)

400 N.W.2d 923

James WARMKA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARTLAND CICERO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent-Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided February 19, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendant-respondent-petitioner there was a brief by William A. Woodrow, Thomas A. Woodrow and Adams, Woodrow & Mathey, S.C., Neenah, and oral argument by William A. Woodrow.

For the plaintiff-appellant there was a brief by Maureen L. Kinney and Johns & Flaherty, S.C., LaCrosse and oral argument by Maureen L. Kinney.

For the amicus curiae (Wisconsin Insurance Alliance) there was a brief by James T. Murray, Jr. and Randy S. Parlee, Milwaukee.


STEINMETZ, J.

The issue in this case is whether a bad faith action brought by an insured against his insurer is an action on the policy within the meaning of sec. 631.83(1)(a), Stats.,1 and therefore controlled by the one-year statute of limitations; or is it a separate intentional tort subject to the two-year statute of limitations set forth in sec. 893.57.2

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases