HAINBUCHNER v. MINER

No. 86-753.

31 Ohio St. 3d 133 (1987)

HAINBUCHNER v. MINER, APPELLANT, ET AL.; CALDWELL, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 24, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Williams, Zumkehr & Welser and Benito C.R. Antognoli, for appellant.

Kane, Bangas & Sicuro and Ronald J. Kane, for appellee.


SWEENEY, J.

Appellant, John Miner, has maintained throughout these proceedings that he is entitled to maintain the present action in contribution pursuant to R.C. 1707.41. There is no basis in law or in fact for this contention. R.C. 1707.41 provides in relevant part:

"In addition to the other liabilities imposed by law any person who, by a written or printed circular, prospectus, or advertisement, offers any security for sale, or receives the profits accruing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases