1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 506 So.2d
  5. 506 So.2d 1127 (1987)
 

KING v. LOVEABLE CO.

No. 86-1723.

506 So.2d 1127 (1987)

Carol KING, Petitioner, v. The LOVEABLE COMPANY, et al., Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

May 7, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kimberly Sands, of Larry Sands, P.A., Daytona Beach, for petitioner.

John N. Bogdanoff, of Haas, Boehm, Brown, Rigdon, Seacrest & Fischer, P.A., Daytona Beach, for respondent Loveable Co.

Karel L. Averill, of Fisher, Rusher, Werrenrath, Keiner, Wack & Dickson, Orlando, for respondent Luithlen Dye Corp.

Randall M. Bolinger, of Smalbein, Eubank, Johnson, Rosier & Bussey, P.A., Orlando, for respondent Sullivan-Carson, Inc.

UPCHURCH, Chief Judge.

Petitioner who was the plaintiff in the action below seeks a writ of certiorari to review a discovery order entered upon defendant's motion to permit visual inspection of petitioner's injury. The petitioner's complaint alleged that she had purchased a black brassiere manufactured by defendant, The Loveable Company. After the first wearing she noticed that the shape of the brassiere and its straps were imprinted on her skin. The complaint also...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases