1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 744 P.2d
  5. 744 P.2d 879 (1987)
 

BURNS v. HINMAN

No. 87-127.

744 P.2d 879 (1987)

Virgil and Barbara BURNS, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Jim HINMAN, Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Decided October 29, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Manley, Smith & Dupuis, James A. Manley, Polson, for plaintiffs and appellants.

M. Richard Gebhardt, Ronan, for defendant and respondent.

WEBER, Justice.

Plaintiffs Burns sued Mr. Hinman for breach of a haying contract. The District Court for the Twentieth Judicial District, Lake County, concluded that plaintiffs had proven breach, but had failed to prove that Mr. Hinman caused their damages. It ordered that plaintiffs take nothing by their complaint and awarded Mr. Hinman his costs of suit. We affirm.

The issues are:

1. Did the District Court err in denying plaintiffs consequential...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases