PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks our review of a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. She argues that the trial court committed reversible error when it failed equitably to distribute the husband's vested military pension despite a request by the wife that it do so. Appellee has not filed a brief.
Of course, vested military pension benefits must now be treated as a marital asset [Pastore v. Pastore,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.