1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 734 P.2d
  5. 734 P.2d 877 (1987)
 

IN RE HOCKETT

84-77; SC S32958.

734 P.2d 877 (1987)

303 Or. 150

In re Complaint As to the Conduct of Verden L. HOCKETT, Jr., Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided March 31, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James H. Spence, Roseburg, argued the cause and filed the brief for accused.

George A. Riemer, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for the Oregon State Bar.

PER CURIAM.

In this lawyer discipline case the accused was charged and found to have violated, inter alia, former DR 1-102(A)(4), presently DR 1-102(A)(3), (lawyer shall not engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), DR 5-105(A) (conflict of interest) and DR 7-102(A)(7) (lawyer shall not assist client in conduct known to be illegal or fraudulent).1 We,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases