GOLDWATER v. ALSTON & BIRD

Civ. No. 85-4302.

673 F.Supp. 930 (1987)

Hymen P. GOLDWATER, Plaintiff, and William F. Dalton, Intervenor/Plaintiff, v. ALSTON & BIRD, Price Waterhouse, Centerre Bancorporation, Hospital Management Associates, Inc., (HMA) and H.M.A., Inc., the Jones, Bird 7 Howell Partners, Jones, Bird 7 Howell and Peter Wright, Jack Hereth, Futra Industries, Inc., and Hereth Jones, Inc., Gallop, Johnson 7 Newman and J. Neil Huber, Donald Gallop, Allan Johnson, Sanford, Newman, Thomas Lewin, P. Terence Crebs, and Stephen Rovak, Mt. Vernon Hospital, Inc., Jefferson County Health Facilities Authority, Inc., Michael A. Alexander, Robert O. Kent, Kenneth Martin, Jr., William D. Thackery, Floyd Collins and Max W. Schurtz, Peter Orr, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois, Benton Division.

July 31, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. Keith Phoenix, Kenneth W. Bean, Robert Ritter, Paul C. Hetterman, St. Louis, Mo., R. Alan Stotsenburg, David C. Harrison, Donna Glasgow, New York City, for plaintiff.

Mary Bonarcorsi, W. Stanley Walch, Barry Short, Daniel Claggett, Michael Vitale, St. Louis, Mo., Richard Boyle, Belleville, Ill., Paul D. Giamanco, Mt. Vernon, Ill., Al J. Pranaitis, Alton, Ill., Rebecca Jackson, David Slavkin, Frederick H. Mayer, Timothy K. Kellett, St. Louis, Mo., Mr. Lawrence A. Farese, Cummings & Lockwood, Naples, Fla., Joseph R. Davidson, Granite City, Ill., Peter J. Anderson, Kirk McAlpin, Atlanta, Ga., R.W. Wilson, Edwardsville, Ill., James Spiotto, Rick Bailey, Chapman & Cutler, Chicago, Ill., William Cobb, H. Marshall Korschun, Atlanta, Ga., Michael Pitzer, John Cunningham, Brown, James & Rabbitt, P.C., Mark G. Arnold, St. Louis, Mo., for defendants.


ORDER

FOREMAN, Chief Judge:

Before the Court are the defendants' various Motions to Reconsider or Alternatively to Certify for Interlocutory Appeal (Documents No. 286, 289, 290, 291, and 292), as well as bond counsel defendants' and Gallop, Johnson defendants' Motion to Amend Notice of Class Determination. After much study and deliberation, the Court rules as follows.

The Motions to Reconsider or Certify Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases