AT & T COMMUNICATIONS v. PUB. UTIL. COM'N

Nos. 14657, 14658.

735 S.W.2d 866 (1987)

AT & T COMMUNICATIONS OF the SOUTHWEST, INC., et al., Appellants, v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS, et al., Appellees. MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, et al., Appellants, v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS, et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin.

Rehearing Denied September 23, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ray G. Besing, Dallas, J. Alan Holman, Dennis P. Reis, Brown, Maroney, Rose, Barber & Dye, Austin, for MCI.

Thomas M. Pollan, Katie Bond, Bickerstaff, Heath & Smiley, Austin, for Texas Ass'n of Long Distance Telephone Cos.

W. Scott McCollough, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, for State Purchasing & Gen. Services Com'n.

Thomas A. Grimaldi, Shawnee Mission, Kan., for U.S. Telecom.

Paul Herrmann, McElroy, Williams & Sullivan, Austin, for U.S. Sprint.

Geoffrey M. Gay, Asst. Public Counsel, Austin, for Office of Public Utility Counsel.

Fernando Rodriguez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, for Public Utility Com'n.

John Andrew Martin, Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal, Dallas, for Continental Tele. Co.

Dale H. Johnson, Brian P. Quinn, McWhorter, Cobb & Johnson, Lubbock, for Texas Statewide Telephone Co-op.

Brook Bennett Brown, McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, Austin, for Central Telephone Co.

Grace H. Casstevens, Butler & Casstevens, Austin, for Cities.

Jon Dee Lawrence, Southwestern Bell, Robert J. Hearon, Jr., Graves, Dougherty, Hearon & Moody, Austin, for Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Joe N. Pratt, Kleberg, Dyer, Redford & Weil, Austin, for AT & T.

Before SHANNON, C.J., and BRADY and CARROLL (not participating), JJ.


SHANNON, Chief Justice.

Appellant AT & T Communications of the Southwest, Inc., (AT & T), and others, perfected administrative appeals to the district court of Travis County from orders of the Public Utility Commission in docket nos. 5113 and 5220. In docket no. 5113, the Commission established and applied a system of long distance telephone "access charges," while docket no. 5220 concerned Southwestern Bell's application for a rate increase. Appellees Southwestern...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases