1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 516 N.E.2d
  5. 516 N.E.2d 1082 (1987)
 

JACKEL v. PETER ECKRICH & SONS

No. 93A02-8706-EX-227.

516 N.E.2d 1082 (1987)

Richard A. JACKEL, Appellant (Plaintiff below), v. PETER ECKRICH & SONS, Appellee (Defendant below).

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District.

December 21, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sherrill W. Colvin, Snouffer, Haller & Colvin, Fort Wayne, for appellant.

Edward N. Kalamaros, Thomas F. Cohen, Edward N. Kalamaros & Associates, P.C., South Bend, for appellee.

HOFFMAN, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Richard A. Jackel appeals the denial of his claim for the cost of prescription work shoes as an aspect of compensation for injuries he suffered during a work-related accident while employed by Peter Eckrich & Sons. The Industrial Board of Indiana (the Board) found that the cost of the prescription work shoes was speculative and would not limit or reduce Jackel's impairment.

The evidence relevant to this appeal discloses...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases