PER CURIAM.
The appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for speedy trial discharge and in sentencing him in violation of his plea agreement without giving him the opportunity to withdraw his plea.
After reviewing the record and the relevant case law, we conclude that the trial court was correct in denying the appellant's motion for speedy trial discharge. See State v. Rasul,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.