1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 824 F.2d
  5. 824 F.2d 761 (1987)
 

U.S. v. CROW

No. 86-1234.

824 F.2d 761 (1987)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ralph M. CROW, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 11, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

L. Anthony White and Robert Bork, Reno, Nev., for plaintiff-appellee.

Ralph M. Crow, Carson City, Nev., for defendant-appellant.

Before KOELSCH and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and BRYAN, District Judge.

KOELSCH, Circuit Judge:

Crow urges but two grounds for reversal of his conviction:

1. That the information does not charge a crime,1 2. That the evidence is insufficient to establish guilt.

Neither has merit.

1. The use of a "bare bones" information — that is one employing the statutory language alone — is quite common and entirely permissible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases