ERICKSON, Justice.
In this original proceeding, the defendant, Lawrence Aoki, petitions this court pursuant to C.A.R. 21 for an order requiring the respondent district court to vacate an order compelling a defense-retained psychiatrist to testify on behalf of the prosecution. We issued a rule to show cause why the requested relief should not be granted, and now discharge the rule.
I.
This is a companion case to Miller v. District Court,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.