LAURENT v. UNIROYAL, INC.

No. 86-3106.

515 So.2d 1050 (1987)

Marie LAURENT, Appellant, v. UNIROYAL, INC., Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 24, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Friedman & Miller and Robert Miller, North Miami Beach, and Mark L. Siedle, Hollywood, for appellant.

Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Tutan, O'Hara, McCoy, Graham & Lane and Shelley H. Leinicke, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

In Marie Laurent's appeal from an adverse Final Judgment, she cites as error the trial court's refusal to permit the introduction of a rebuttal witness' testimony impeaching Uniroyal, Inc.'s expert witness and the trial court's exclusion of testimony as to what the vehicle owner would have done if Uniroyal had warned against mixing types of tires. We affirm.

First, we find no error in the trial court's exclusion of Laurent's rebuttal testimony...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases